- Published: Saturday, 11 October 2003 11:19
I give you this shining example of how racially tolerant the Democrat Party really is: ‘Despicable’ Democrats Under Fire for Racial Slur Against Indian-Americans
I just get warm all over when I see the mask slip from Liberals faces. It seems to me that the Liberals believe everybody should own a pet minority person.
“This is just typical liberal spin trying to throw race into it to bring down the opposition or to bring themselves up,” spokesman David Joyslin said. “As Republicans, we don’t care about race. We just look at the person’s stance on the issues and if they’re going to be a good candidate.”
Clinton appointed Madeleine Albright as Secretary of State because she was a woman. A quick look at her resume would have clearly shown that she was not qualified. I don’t recall any Black (or any minority) people in high places of power under President Clinton.
President Bush has appointed a wealth of minorities and women into positions of authority, and (gasp!) all of them are actually competent and qualified. Will wonders never cease.
So which party is actually the more tolerant one? The one on the Left that promotes tokens that promptly bump into a glass ceiling, or the one on the Right that promotes on qualifications first, skin color/sex second?Write comment (0 Comments)